A court fundamentally hostile to the rights of voters places the court increasingly at odds with democracy itself.

Reading the tea leaves from cryptic Supreme Court orders can be perilous business because the justices are not bound by the questions they ask at oral argument, the offhand comments they … Continue re ...

The Supreme Court will hear what could be a voting rights landmark.

A legal expert flagged an "ominous" order the U.S. Supreme Court slipped into view over a summer weekend that could even ...

The GOP-driven proposal to redraw Texas' congressional boundaries takes aim at North Texas Democrats and shuffles voters of ...

Among Republican-led states, Ohio could try to further expand the 10-5 edge that the GOP holds in the House delegation; a ...

Washington: Redistricting in the United States usually happens once every 10 years, following the national population count ...

The U.S. Supreme Court gave its strongest indication yet that it would rework, if not abandon, reapportionment jurisprudence ...