The National Institutes of Health announced major reductions to indirect costs for research funding Feb. 7 in a move many experts say would cause serious harm to lifesaving medical ...

The NIH blanket cap at 15% is arbitrary, an imaginary line, without regard for whether a 26% indirect cost is needed or a 60% indirect cost. The end result will simply mean less funding and less ...

Federal rulings pausing NIH grant cuts highlight an unprecedented, adversarial shift in U.S. research funding, leaving academic medicine institutions wary of deeper rifts. In June, federal judges ...

A federal judge on June 20 rejected the National Science Foundation’s move to cap indirect costs related to its research grants at 15%, following similar decisions by other courts. Most universities ...

After years of conversations surrounding indirect research costs, academic groups are now under the gun to quickly come up with an alternative to the NIH’s proposed 15% across-the-board cap on ...

We’re going to lose people from Ohio to other states that might have more resources in the space that don’t rely as much on ...

Leaders at the institutes say reductions across multiple federal agencies 'would result in thousands of jobs being cut.' ...

A federal judge struck down National Institutes of Health, or NIH, directives that led to the cancellation of research grants ...

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from making drastic cuts to research funding that is provided by the ...

Three Pennsylvania nonprofits share a uniquely focused mission on public health. Looming federal cuts to scientific research, ...