The World Health Organization is drawing up a list of reasons why the U.S. should remain in the WHO for its own good, two sources familiar with the process told Reuters, as part of an attempt by its supporters to lobby incoming President Donald Trump.

The US tends to ping-pong on the rule based on the president’s political party, but Trump’s version goes further than previous bans. View on euronews

President Donald Trump’s decision to exit the World Health Organization means the U.N. agency is losing its biggest funder

Trump moved to quit the U.N. health agency during his last presidency and is expected to take similar steps in his new administration, possibly as soon as he is inaugurated on Monday.

That order would withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization ... health policy researcher at Queen Mary University of London. And it's challenging for a complex intergovernmental organization to shift its operations when it loses a ...

The British Journal of Midwifery ’s annual conference is again being sponsored by formula milk companies, despite clinicians and nutritionists repeatedly raising concerns about the practice which flouts World Health Organization guidance.

World Health Organization chief says agency already cutting back on hiring and travel with Trump withdrawal set to hit funding.

The latest evidence comes in the news that Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves want to build more airport runways in London. Ms. Reeves on Wednesday promised to build a third runway at Heathrow airport west of London, ...

As part of a rash of executive orders completed on his first day back in the White House, President Donald Trump began the nation’s exit from the World Health Organization. Here, we explain how the withdrawal would work and what it would mean,

UK Health Security Agency figures show 5,480 people were struck by the bacterial infection - spread by coughing - in 2024, a rise of 13 per cent on the previous year.

President Trump’s decision to pull out of the international health agency could deprive the United States of crucial scientific data and lessen the country’s influence in setting a global health agenda.